jimingham wrote: > > Is there anyway we can add a test for this behavior? Maybe something in > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/lldb/unittests/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationTest.cpp? > > It would be nice to have something that shows we never send the > > "disable-singlstep-enable" packets for the breakpoint when this feature is > > enabled. > > I did explore this, but I couldn't find a reasonable way. Code paths that do > stepping + breakpoints require a full lldb-server in the test.
You might be able to write a test using the fake gdb-server method employed by the GDBRemoteTestBase derived tests in `functionalities/gdb_remote_client. You would make a fake session which says it doesn't need stepping over breakpoints, then fake hitting a breakpoint and then continue in lldb and assert that you didn't get the breakpoint removal packet before the `c` packet. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165760 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
