Michael137 wrote: > This going to be quite useful for diagnosing perplexing errors! > > > note: Requested expression evaluation as 'c' but fell back to 'c++'. > > * Do we have a table that would translate the spec names into human-readable > names (objc -> Objective-C, c -> C, ...) we could use for this?
Not that I'm aware of. Could try creating one > * Is there any explanation we could offer as to why LLDB didn't honor the > language the user requested? Yea we could elaborate. I didn't want to make the `note` too verbose, but I'll try to expand it a bit. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161688 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
