mstorsjo wrote: > I'm no real MinGW user, and I couldn't find documentation on the mangling > used there, so I relied on examples. The mangled names on i686 mingw32 do > have two underscores. From [this comment on an old > patch](https://reviews.llvm.org/D22939#500090), it does seem like this is > intended. But I can't find where Clang does this. Maybe @mstorsjo knows more?
I'm not entirely sure where that happens in the stack either, but you're right - there's a global `_` prefix on all symbols. > Itanium specifies that mangled names start with _Z (and ___Z for blocks). A > second leading underscore is a global symbol prefix added on some platforms > (Darwin and possibly mingw?). Exactly. The extra underscore prefix on i386 isn't mingw specific either, it's on MSVC as well - for regular C symbols. For other calling conventions (like fastcall or vectorcall) the prefix is different though, and for MSVC C++ mangled symbols, there's a different prefix. But Itanium C++ ABI on i386 works through the regular (cdecl) mangling, which adds a `_` prefix, just like all regular plain C functions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160930 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
