================
@@ -339,6 +389,8 @@ ConvertTypeToDiagnosticString(ASTContext &Context, QualType
Ty,
<< "' " << Values << ")";
return DecoratedString;
}
+
+ TryConvertOverflowBehaviorTypeToDiagnosticString(Context, Ty, S);
----------------
JustinStitt wrote:
OK, so should I drop this special handling and store it in a different branch
for another time? FYI, if we go with pure attribute printing there will be a
lot of churn in my tests as they all have the short-hand types.
BTW, I think we decided not to go with making `__wrap` and `__no_wrap` keywords
as maybe some projects already use these from the preprocessor? I am not sure
on any precedence between when to make something attribute-only v.s. when to
introduce a keyword.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148914
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
