================
@@ -402,4 +404,120 @@ Interpreter::Visit(const BitFieldExtractionNode *node) {
return child_valobj_sp;
}
+static lldb::TypeSystemSP GetTypeSystemFromCU(std::shared_ptr<StackFrame> ctx)
{
+ SymbolContext symbol_context =
+ ctx->GetSymbolContext(lldb::eSymbolContextCompUnit);
+ lldb::LanguageType language = symbol_context.comp_unit->GetLanguage();
+
+ symbol_context = ctx->GetSymbolContext(lldb::eSymbolContextModule);
+ llvm::Expected<lldb::TypeSystemSP> type_system =
+ symbol_context.module_sp->GetTypeSystemForLanguage(language);
+
+ if (type_system)
+ return *type_system;
+
+ return lldb::TypeSystemSP();
+}
+
+static CompilerType GetBasicType(lldb::TypeSystemSP type_system,
+ lldb::BasicType basic_type) {
+ if (type_system)
+ if (auto compiler_type =
type_system.get()->GetBasicTypeFromAST(basic_type))
+ return compiler_type;
+
+ CompilerType empty_type;
+ return empty_type;
+}
+
+llvm::Expected<CompilerType>
+Interpreter::PickLiteralType(lldb::TypeSystemSP type_system,
----------------
labath wrote:
That could be fine too, but I think that what you have here is pretty good as
well. I don't see a reason to change it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152308
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
