JDevlieghere wrote: > I was thinking a bit more about the `Destroy` method, which I was not too too > happy with, and thought about just changing it to be a "Resume" method. > Something like the below, what do you think?
I see the appeal, but I think it's too specialized. IMHO, conceptually, resuming the process isn't the execution context's business. It also seems like it should be possible to query the target (but probably not the process) while holding the API lock, but after giving up the stop lock. Maybe a better name would be `Release`. The `StoppedExecutionContext` is an RAII object with "Stopped" in the name. It seems fairly obvious that the stopped part is what goes away when you destroy/release the object. Maybe a Doxygen comment explaining why you get the API lock back but not the stop lock would address your concerns? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152020 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
