ashgti wrote: Yea, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-adding-mcp-support-to-lldb/86798 discussed this as a future improvement.
I started working on trying to make a dedicated lldb-mcp binary in [776128af07e06a2595087ecee6ffadbc2ec6ffa5 ](https://github.com/ashgti/llvm-project/commit/776128af07e06a2595087ecee6ffadbc2ec6ffa5) but your correct, the `lldb-mcp` binary would be a client we can specify for an LLM for more streamlined integration than the current strategy of using `nc` to forward requests. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152059 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
