================ @@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ +//===-- ScriptedFrame.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "ScriptedFrame.h" + +#include "lldb/Utility/DataBufferHeap.h" + +using namespace lldb; +using namespace lldb_private; + +void ScriptedFrame::CheckInterpreterAndScriptObject() const { + lldbassert(m_script_object_sp && "Invalid Script Object."); + lldbassert(GetInterface() && "Invalid Scripted Frame Interface."); +} + +llvm::Expected<std::shared_ptr<ScriptedFrame>> +ScriptedFrame::Create(ScriptedThread &thread, + StructuredData::DictionarySP args_sp, + StructuredData::Generic *script_object) { + if (!thread.IsValid()) + return llvm::createStringError("Invalid scripted thread."); + + thread.CheckInterpreterAndScriptObject(); + + auto scripted_frame_interface = + thread.GetInterface()->CreateScriptedFrameInterface(); ---------------- jimingham wrote:
Yes, if the check failed, this would be unsafe. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149622 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
