================
@@ -906,6 +982,20 @@ lldb::addr_t IRExecutionUnit::FindInUserDefinedSymbols(
lldb::addr_t IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol(lldb_private::ConstString name,
bool &missing_weak) {
+ if (name.GetStringRef().starts_with(FunctionCallLabelPrefix)) {
+ if (auto addr_or_err = ResolveFunctionCallLabel(name.GetStringRef(),
+ m_sym_ctx, missing_weak)) {
+ return *addr_or_err;
+ } else {
+ LLDB_LOG_ERROR(GetLog(LLDBLog::Expressions), addr_or_err.takeError(),
+ "Failed to resolve function call label '{1}': {0}",
+ name.GetStringRef());
+ return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // TODO: do we still need the following lookups?
----------------
labath wrote:
(I can also imagine using some sort of a mangling scheme for symtab symbols.
Technically those aren't unique either (local symbols), though it doesn't help
us with anything without a way to disambiguate them.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148877
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
