DavidSpickett wrote:

> And by searching that error message I found:

Hacking that to be DWARF64 gets more tests passing:
```
Total Discovered Tests: 33363
  Skipped          :     1 (0.00%)
  Unsupported      :   518 (1.55%)
  Passed           : 32696 (98.00%)
  Expectedly Failed:    31 (0.09%)
  Unresolved       :     2 (0.01%)
  Failed           :   115 (0.34%)
```
I suggest you look in lldb's source for any uses of the DWARF32 symbol, I bet 
we've done this elsewhere too.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147054
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to