DavidSpickett wrote: > And by searching that error message I found:
Hacking that to be DWARF64 gets more tests passing: ``` Total Discovered Tests: 33363 Skipped : 1 (0.00%) Unsupported : 518 (1.55%) Passed : 32696 (98.00%) Expectedly Failed: 31 (0.09%) Unresolved : 2 (0.01%) Failed : 115 (0.34%) ``` I suggest you look in lldb's source for any uses of the DWARF32 symbol, I bet we've done this elsewhere too. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147054 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits