jyknight wrote: > Thanks for the concrete example! [..]
I just wanted to thank you (a bit late) for the explanation above, it was really helpful! > FWIW I'd like to get rid of the reference count of DiagnosticsEngine too, and > make the lifetimes stricter and more explicit, but that's a lower priority > compared to the DiagnosticOptions refactor for me. I do hope that will happen someday, because that does seem to be a key part of the confusion here. But I totally understand about the priority. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139584 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
