labath wrote:

> It still seems pretty aggressive to log all LLDB_LOG_ERROR messages to the 
> console, but this is a stop-gap until we want to do something about it.

I said as much on the PR, and still think it's too aggressive to send all these 
errors to the system log.



> Looks like this error just happens anytime we build the aranges table for a 
> CU and the `DW_TAG_subprogram` doesn't have a `DW_AT_low_pc`/`DW_AT_high_pc`; 
> which is always the case for forward declarations. Should we maybe just skip 
> the call to `GetAttributeAddressRanges` here when we're looking at forward 
> declaration DIEs?

That's probably fine. This code sounds like it could be relatively hot, so I 
feel slightly bad for doing another scan of the abbreviation  just to do what 
we do anyway (ignore the DIE), but this may actually be faster than 
constructing the llvm::Error object.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144037
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to