dmpots wrote: > this is really an change to one of the foundational llvm classes, so you > should get someone from the llvm side to review this
Tagging a few people involved in the last PR (#75469) that modified this code path: @arsenm, @MaskRay, @lhames, @dsandersllvm, @rudkx > and also add an (llvm) test to demonstrate/test the behavior you expect. Great call out. Looks like this would be a good place to add a test: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/unittests/TargetParser/TripleTest.cpp https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143633 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
