Lgtm, and as we start untangling the mess of dependencies in liblldb id like for us to take the same approach there too (as llvm does) On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:08 AM Pavel Labath via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> labath added a comment. > > Any thoughts on this? > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D26975 > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
