JDevlieghere wrote: I haven't looked at the code yet. I was re-reading the launch sequence part of the spec [1] to make sure this still complies, and I believe it does because the spec talks about _responding_ to the request, not about _handling_ it.
> After the response to configurationDone is sent, the debug adapter may > respond to the launch or attach request, and then the debug session has > started. That said, does this actually solve the underlying problems? We know that VS Code sends the launch and attach request before configuration done. It's equally valid to not do that, and do things the way they're shown in the sequence diagram, where you set breakpoints, then configuration done, then launch or attach. Won't that still hit the same problem? [1] https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/overview https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140299 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
