DavidSpickett wrote: > We had code which was waiting for an pipe EOF, but it never got that due to > the FD ending up in an unsuspecting (and unrelated) process. Although that's > possible to solve in a different way, I think it's still better to declare > all of the FDs passed to a process explicitly.
Skill issue on my part but I don't understand how a file descriptor "ends up" in another process. My interaction with them has been as handles, so I assumed anyone who has the handle would be able to use them. No need to solve that education problem but that's probably why I am slow to realise the point of this change. I have not dealt with the symptoms before. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126935 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
