================
@@ -88,6 +89,29 @@ class IdentifierNode : public ASTNode {
std::string m_name;
};
+class MemberOfNode : public ASTNode {
+public:
+ MemberOfNode(uint32_t location, ASTNodeUP base, bool is_arrow,
+ ConstString name)
+ : ASTNode(location, NodeKind::eMemberOfNode), m_base(std::move(base)),
+ m_is_arrow(is_arrow), m_field_name(name) { }
+
+ llvm::Expected<lldb::ValueObjectSP> Accept(Visitor *v) const override;
+
+ ASTNode *base() const { return m_base.get(); }
+ bool IsArrow() const { return m_is_arrow; }
----------------
labath wrote:
Let's be consistent with the names here. I see we've used `GetFoo` elsewhere.
@kuilpd, I missed this in the UnaryOpNode (because it was self-consistent at
least, but I think that one should also use the GetFoo scheme.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138093
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
