hapeeeeee wrote: > This patch may be all that's necessary, I haven't reproduced the failure > myself. We'd really like to have a test for this to ensure it doesn't > regress, I recently added a watchpoint API test to the testsuite as > `lldb/test/API/functionalities/watchpoint/consecutive-watchpoints`, the only > difference is that after you've set the watchpoint once, you'd want to > `process.Kill()` and then `process = target.LaunchSimple(None, None, > os.getcwd())` or something, to execute back to the breakpoint.
Hi @jasonmolenda , I have added a test for the patch in `llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Watchpoint/ReuseWatchpointAfterReExecProcess.test`, and I have tested it in `ARM/AArch64` native environments. Please review my code again. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136682 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
