mehdi_amini added a comment. OK!
How is it different from the other proposal? In the other proposal, using a LLVM class in the API boundary would break the same way under the same conditions, or did I miss something? Something that isn't clear to me with this proposal, is how a user supposed to include its own copy of LLVM? Let say I write a client code that link to libLLVM.so and libLLDB.so? https://reviews.llvm.org/D26190 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
