Can I have some background? What is the linking problem? On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:16 AM Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> tfiala added a comment. > > I'll let Greg comment on the public ABI expansion (i.e. including llvm of > a specific version, which may differ from LLDB.framework clients that > contain different versions of LLVM). My guess is this is not going to work > for us, since we have long-lived frameworks shipped with Xcode that get > used by clients where we cannot assume what they are or are not using. > However, we could address that by adding the reverse flag, which would be > "don't export LLVM", and have that be exported by default. > > The bit I care about is the "modulo backtrace(3)..." part. This change is > taking away my ability to use log-based stacktraces on Linux if I read it > right. How were you envisioning I do that with this change? > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D26188 > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
