kastiglione wrote: @jimingham I agree that expanding the output of `v` while listing variables could be a regression. However note that this change is to `dwim-print`, not `v`, and so this change would not cause the problem you're describing. This is because `dwim-print` has neither a "print all variables", nor a "print more than one variable" mode.
In the discussion above @Michael137 asked whether `v` and `expr` should also have this expand behavior, and you've given a good argument for `v` to not have this behavior. > We also have to make sure that we don't end up expanding variables that > people have summaries for I hadn't thought about this. I'll add a test for this case. Other than ensuring objects are not expanded when their summary dictates they not be expanded, are you ok with this change to `dwim-print`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117500 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
