================ @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +//===-- source/Host/aix/Host.cpp ----------------------------------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "lldb/Host/Host.h" +#include "lldb/Utility/ProcessInfo.h" +#include "lldb/Utility/Status.h" +#include <dirent.h> + +using namespace llvm; +using namespace lldb; +using namespace lldb_private; + +namespace { +enum class ProcessState { + Unknown, + Dead, + DiskSleep, + Idle, + Paging, + Parked, + Running, + Sleeping, + TracedOrStopped, + Zombie, +}; +} + +namespace lldb_private { +class ProcessLaunchInfo; +} + +static bool GetStatusInfo(::pid_t Pid, ProcessInstanceInfo &ProcessInfo, + ProcessState &State, ::pid_t &TracerPid, + ::pid_t &Tgid) { + return false; +} + +static void GetProcessArgs(::pid_t pid, ProcessInstanceInfo &process_info) {} + +static bool GetProcessAndStatInfo(::pid_t pid, + ProcessInstanceInfo &process_info, + ProcessState &State, ::pid_t &tracerpid) { + return false; +} + +uint32_t Host::FindProcessesImpl(const ProcessInstanceInfoMatch &match_info, + ProcessInstanceInfoList &process_infos) { ---------------- labath wrote:
IIUC, this whole function is right now equivalent to `return 0` (because the static functions above are stubbed out. If the goal is to provide an empty implementation (so that the rest of code can build), can you do just that? If you want to actually implement this function, then I'd like to see the static functions implemented as well (so that I can e.g. see whether it makes sense to share the code with the linux implementation). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130582 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
