Author: jimingham
Date: 2025-02-28T13:44:17-08:00
New Revision: ddbce2fd2380a4eafce9065ad991318f46a3292b

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ddbce2fd2380a4eafce9065ad991318f46a3292b
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ddbce2fd2380a4eafce9065ad991318f46a3292b.diff

LOG: Control the "step out through thunk" logic explicitly when pushing thread 
plans (#129301)

Jonas recently added a trampoline handling strategy for simple language
thunks that does: "step through language thunks stepping in one level
deep and stopping if you hit user code". That was actually pulled over
from the swift implementation. However, this strategy and the strategy
we have to "step out past language thunks" when stepping out come into
conflict if the thunk you are stepping through calls some other function
before dispatching to the intended method. When you step out of the
called function back into the thunk, should you keep stepping out past
the thunk or not?

In most cases, you want to step out past the thunk, but in this
particular case you don't.

This patch adds a way to inform the thread plan (or really it's
ShouldStopHere behavior) of which behavior it should have, and passes
the don't step through thunks to the step through plan it uses to step
through thunks.

I didn't add a test for this because I couldn't find a C++ thunk that
calls another function before getting to the target function. I asked
the clang folks here if they could think of a case where clang would do
this, and they couldn't. If anyone can think of such a construct, it
will be easy to write the step through test for it...

This does happen in swift, however, so when I cherry-pick this to the
swift fork I'll test it there.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    lldb/include/lldb/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.h
    lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.cpp
    lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepInRange.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/lldb/include/lldb/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.h 
b/lldb/include/lldb/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.h
index 54b30291c3995..d0094c90b91a5 100644
--- a/lldb/include/lldb/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.h
+++ b/lldb/include/lldb/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.h
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ class ThreadPlanShouldStopHere {
     eNone = 0,
     eAvoidInlines = (1 << 0),
     eStepInAvoidNoDebug = (1 << 1),
-    eStepOutAvoidNoDebug = (1 << 2)
+    eStepOutAvoidNoDebug = (1 << 2),
+    eStepOutPastThunks = (1 << 3)
   };
 
   // Constructors and Destructors

diff  --git a/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.cpp 
b/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.cpp
index fa6bc08a9914d..d2cca49987f0f 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.cpp
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 
 #include "lldb/Target/ThreadPlanShouldStopHere.h"
 #include "lldb/Symbol/Symbol.h"
+#include "lldb/Target/Language.h"
 #include "lldb/Target/LanguageRuntime.h"
 #include "lldb/Target/RegisterContext.h"
 #include "lldb/Target/Thread.h"
@@ -83,7 +84,12 @@ bool ThreadPlanShouldStopHere::DefaultShouldStopHereCallback(
     if (Symbol *symbol = frame->GetSymbolContext(eSymbolContextSymbol).symbol) 
{
       ProcessSP process_sp(current_plan->GetThread().GetProcess());
       for (auto *runtime : process_sp->GetLanguageRuntimes()) {
-        if (runtime->IsSymbolARuntimeThunk(*symbol)) {
+        if (runtime->IsSymbolARuntimeThunk(*symbol) &&
+            flags.Test(ThreadPlanShouldStopHere::eStepOutPastThunks)) {
+          LLDB_LOGF(
+              log, "Stepping out past a language thunk %s for: %s",
+              frame->GetFunctionName(),
+              Language::GetNameForLanguageType(runtime->GetLanguageType()));
           should_stop_here = false;
           break;
         }
@@ -131,9 +137,12 @@ ThreadPlanSP 
ThreadPlanShouldStopHere::DefaultStepFromHereCallback(
       // because it's marked line 0.
       bool is_thunk = false;
       for (auto *runtime : process_sp->GetLanguageRuntimes()) {
-        if (runtime->IsSymbolARuntimeThunk(*sc.symbol)) {
-          LLDB_LOGF(log, "In runtime thunk %s - stepping out.",
-                    sc.symbol->GetName().GetCString());
+        if (runtime->IsSymbolARuntimeThunk(*sc.symbol) &&
+            flags.Test(ThreadPlanShouldStopHere::eStepOutPastThunks)) {
+          LLDB_LOGF(
+              log, "Stepping out past a language thunk %s for: %s",
+              frame->GetFunctionName(),
+              Language::GetNameForLanguageType(runtime->GetLanguageType()));
           is_thunk = true;
           break;
         }

diff  --git a/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepInRange.cpp 
b/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepInRange.cpp
index 109d1b6b3435b..8a2417e9da326 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepInRange.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepInRange.cpp
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ using namespace lldb;
 using namespace lldb_private;
 
 uint32_t ThreadPlanStepInRange::s_default_flag_values =
-    ThreadPlanShouldStopHere::eStepInAvoidNoDebug;
+    ThreadPlanShouldStopHere::eStepInAvoidNoDebug |
+    ThreadPlanShouldStopHere::eStepOutPastThunks;
 
 // ThreadPlanStepInRange: Step through a stack range, either stepping over or
 // into based on the value of \a type.


        
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to