Michael137 wrote: I looked at the memory footprint of LLDB while debugging LLDB and there wasn't noticeable difference in resident memory usage between top-of-tree and this patch. I made sure to evaluate expressions that open up large source files. I do agree it feels a bit weird to be paying for opening source files if we only ever use it in diagnostics (not the common case). But maybe that's a cost worth paying?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127829 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
