jimingham wrote: This is a little weird - why would the value of a ValueObject when interpreted as its Dynamic Value ever be in host memory? That seems odd, made doubly so because it's unused in the current sources. So I really worry about this getting broken.
Would it be possible to cons up a unittest that makes this artificially? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125143 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
