labath wrote: Let's continue the discussion [here](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-fixing-incompatibilties-of-the-x-packet-w-r-t-gdb/84288/8).
(It could work it's just not how gdb implemented it. Sniffing of zero-length reads was considered, but a qSupported feature was deemed more principled. I suppose one advantage of that is that it saves us one round-trip (after we no longer need to support/detect the lldb-x implementation)) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124733 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
