================ @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ #include <sys/utsname.h> #include <unistd.h> +#ifdef __ANDROID__ +#include <android/api-level.h> ---------------- enh-google wrote:
> is it possible those includes were necessary 10 years ago? yeah, one reason i'm so confidently asserting that you shouldn't need this now is because i know we had a big cleanup to ensure that we hadn't missed any :-) > we could assume that any header which includes the definition of a C function > we're about to call, also includes the definition of that macro -- which I > guess must be true as otherwise it wouldn't be able to annotate the > declaration correct. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124383 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits