Michael137 wrote: > I like the unit test, but why don't we (also) have an end-to-end for the > explicit object parameter feature? Is there something still missing for the > full support?
Yea there's still a couple of issues with it. Particularly, expression evaluation in such methods currently doesn't work. But I suspect that isn't DWARF parser related, but due to assumptions in other parts of the expression evaluator. One particularly nasty looking blocker is that `clang::ParmVarDecl::isExplicitObjectParameter` is only `true` if it has a valid source location. But we never attach valid source locations to decls from DWARF. Still need to investigate exactly what's going on though https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124096 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
