ldionne wrote:

IIUC, the build that encountered issues in this patch ([in the comment 
above](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115380#issuecomment-2590801533))
 is a flavour of (2), right? That seems surprising to me though since we also 
use the same flags when configuring libc++: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/libcxx/CMakeLists.txt#L596

So the difference would be that you folks are building libc++ instrumented via 
the bootstrapping build instead of the "runtimes" build that we use for the 
rest of libc++ CI. I also fail to understand why our own bootstrapping build 
pre-commit CI didn't trip this wire.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115380
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to