DhruvSrivastavaX wrote: > For me personally this would look better as thin syscall wrapper -- a static > function with all arguments passed explicitly (since the arguments are > modified, it would have to be MutableArrayRef, and not ArrayRef as I > originally wrote), rather than a method, but this will work too.
Okay sure. That will increase the utility of the API. Done! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120378 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
