ted accepted this revision. ted added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
The problem this scenario has is asynchronous output from 2 different sources. The original fix made Windows (or any lldb without libedit) much better, but I think most non-Windows builds will use libedit, because it's extremely useful. lldb-mi has a different set of constraints; the position of the prompt isn't as important, since users won't use it as a cue to tell when the debugger can accept more input. Since this improves lldb-mi, and only hurts a use case I think is not very prevalent (LLDB_DISABLE_LIBEDIT on a non-Windows platform), I think it's OK. LGTM. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D25137 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
