labath wrote: > What is the resolution if we switch to "time since epoch" in an atomic value? > Can we use some casting to cast a double back into a uint64_t for storage in > an atomic? >
That's not a problem. I was referring to the time_point::time_since_epoch() (which returns arbitrary precision), not the unix "seconds since epoch" concept. I've created an alternative implementation in #119377 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118953 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
