DhruvSrivastavaX wrote: > I think we can make some progress here, but I don't think we'll get far > without ProcessLauncher support. At some point, not too far from now, I'm > going to start asking questions like "which tests does this fix", and I don't > think you'll be able to run any of them without a process launcher.
Yes, Thats true. I am just adding this as a part of the parallel drops for each of the independent plugins. Will drop ProcessLauncher support too as a separate patch soon. But yes, It would be great to get inputs from you regarding adding the new tests on which I can build on as I proceed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118160 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
