https://github.com/clayborg commented:
This would be easy to test if we expose this via the public API in `SBTarget`. We don't expose a FindFirstSymbolWithNameAndType, but we can expose maybe: ``` lldb::SBSymbol SBTarget::FindFirstSymbol(const char *name, lldb::SymbolType type = eSymbolTypeAny); ``` Since the target has a module list internally, this can use this new function and test it. To test: - create two binaries each with a code symbol and a data symbol with the same name by compiling with clang. - Create a SBModule via `SBModule(const SBModuleSpec &module_spec);` for each binary - create an empty SBTarget and call `bool SBTarget::AddModule(lldb::SBModule &module);` first with binary 1, and then binary 2, and call the API and sure you get the one from the binary 1 by checking the SBSymbol's SBAddress and getting the module and verifying it is the right one. - do the same thing as above but add binary 2 first and then binary 1. Make sure you get the symbol from binary 2. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117777 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
