dzhidzhoev wrote: > If I understand correctly this is building the test on Linux and running it > on Windows. > > And it seems that the output is in fact better this way? Can't complain about > that.
No, it's the opposite, we're running on Windows host and Linux target. > And if I had to guess, I'd say that all of this platform dancing causes it to > somehow switch the the lldb-server windows implementation, which sends thread > names (unlike the in-process one?). It makes sense. I also thought it was somehow related to remote vs local execution. > Overall, I guess the change is fine, though the combination is not > particularly useful to test. Thank you! Considering that there's "REQUIRES: system-windows" on top of the test, maybe I'll turn it off for target-linux at all? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115722 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
