================
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// Test lldb is able to compute the fully qualified names on templates with
+// -gsimple-template-names and -fdebug-types-section.
+
+// REQUIRES: lld
+
+// Test against logging to see if we print the fully qualified names correctly.
+// RUN: %clangxx --target=x86_64-pc-linux -g -gsimple-template-names %s -o %t
+// RUN: %lldb %t -o "log enable dwarf comp" -o "target variable v1 v2" -o exit
| FileCheck %s --check-prefix=LOG
+
+// Test that we following DW_AT_signature correctly. If not, lldb might
confuse the types of v1 and v2.
+// RUN: %clangxx --target=x86_64-pc-linux -g -gsimple-template-names
-fdebug-types-section %s -o %t
+// RUN: %lldb %t -o "target variable v1 v2" -o exit | FileCheck %s
--check-prefix=TYPE
+
+// LOG: unique name: ::t2<outer_struct1::t1<int> >
+// LOG: unique name: ::t2<outer_struct2::t1<int> >
+
+// TYPE: (t2<outer_struct1::t1<int> >) v1 = {}
+// TYPE-NEXT: (t2<outer_struct2::t1<int> >) v2 = {}
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
Do we need to check the typename that gets displayed here? Is that actually
affected by this patch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112811
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
