labath wrote: > Or just change the function we're calling from `at` to something that doesn't > pull in the symbol from the dylib? That should still provide us with coverage > of calling functions from the `std` module
That might work too (depending on how good we/clang are at not importing the unused parts of the libc++ module). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113935 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
