Michael137 wrote:
> > maybe we could just skip the test if we can't locate the module?
>
> Can you suggest how to do that (locate the module)?
Instead of,
```
self.expect(
lib_stdcxx, "Libraray StdC++ is located", exe=False, substrs=["lib"]
)
``
Do,
```
if "lib" not in libstd_cxx:
self.skipTest("This test requires libstdc++.so or libc++.dylib in the
target's module list.")
```
> > Won't setting USE_LIBSTDCPP be an issue on Darwin?
> > I can't test on Darwin. Maybe the following?
>
> ```
> ifneq ($(OS),Darwin)
> USE_LIBSTDCPP := 1
> else
> USE_SYSTEM_STDLIB := 1
> endif
> ```
Yea that would be an alternative. Don't really have a preference tbh, though
the former seems more robust. @labath @DavidSpickett any thoughts?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112357
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
