medismailben wrote: > > I agree with that, but the argument here was going the other way. > > lldb-enumerations.h are a base set of enumerations that anybody using LLDB, > > either lldb_private or the SB API's are free to use. But the SB API's are > > purely wrappers around lldb_private API's, and so should never be used in > > lldb_private. If you put an SB API header in lldb-enumerations.h, now most > > of lldb_private is going to see it. Does that also fit wth your mental > > model? Jim > > Generally no, though I kind of think the enumeration shouldn't belong in the > API directory to begin with. I see Ismail changed that so it seems like we're > on the same page here.
+1, may be there was a limitation explaining why it was put in the API tree but I didn't bump any issue in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111929. May be @adrian-prantl has some more context with regard to that ? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111907 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
