[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [LLDB][Minidump] Have Minidumps save off and properly read TLS data (PR #109477)

[Pavel Labath via lldb-commits]

================
@@ -6528,6 +6528,74 @@ static void AddRegion(const MemoryRegionInfo &region, 
bool try_dirty_pages,
                 CreateCoreFileMemoryRange(region));
 }
 
+static void AddRegisterSections(Process &process, ThreadSP &thread_sp,
+                                CoreFileMemoryRanges &ranges,
+                                lldb::addr_t range_end) {
+  lldb::RegisterContextSP reg_ctx = thread_sp->GetRegisterContext();
+  if (!reg_ctx)
+    return;
+
+  const RegisterInfo *reg_info = reg_ctx->GetRegisterInfo(
+      lldb::RegisterKind::eRegisterKindGeneric, LLDB_REGNUM_GENERIC_TP);
+  if (!reg_info)
+    return;
+
+  lldb_private::RegisterValue reg_value;
+  bool success = reg_ctx->ReadRegister(reg_info, reg_value);
+  if (!success)
+    return;
+
+  const uint64_t fail_value = UINT64_MAX;
+  bool readSuccess = false;
+  const lldb::addr_t reg_value_addr =
+      reg_value.GetAsUInt64(fail_value, &readSuccess);
+  if (!readSuccess || reg_value_addr == fail_value)
+    return;
+
+  MemoryRegionInfo register_region;
+  Status err = process.GetMemoryRegionInfo(reg_value_addr, register_region);
+  if (err.Fail())
+    return;
+
+  // We already saved off this truncated stack range.
+  if (register_region.GetRange().GetRangeEnd() == range_end)
+    return;
+
+  // We don't need to worry about duplication because the CoreFileMemoryRanges
+  // will unique them
+  AddRegion(register_region, true, ranges);
+}
+
+static void AddModuleSections(Process &process, CoreFileMemoryRanges &ranges,
+                              std::set<addr_t> &stack_ends) {
+  ModuleList &module_list = process.GetTarget().GetImages();
+  Target *target = &process.GetTarget();
+  for (size_t idx = 0; idx < module_list.GetSize(); idx++) {
+    ModuleSP module_sp = module_list.GetModuleAtIndex(idx);
+    if (!module_sp)
+      continue;
+
+    ObjectFile *obj = module_sp->GetObjectFile();
+    if (!obj)
+      continue;
+    Address addr = obj->GetImageInfoAddress(target);
+    addr_t load_addr = addr.GetLoadAddress(target);
+    if (load_addr == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS)
+      continue;
+
+    MemoryRegionInfo tls_storage_region;
+    Status err = process.GetMemoryRegionInfo(load_addr, tls_storage_region);
----------------
labath wrote:

I can believe that. My point is that the `tls_storage_region` is not a good 
name for this variable since it does not actually contain the thread-local data.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109477
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits