lhames wrote: > @lhames could you take a look, please?
Hi @dlav-sc. The `RuntimeDyld` changes look ok to me. We are hoping to switch LLDB to ORC / JITLink soon (https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-removing-mcjit-and-runtimedyld/80464), but JITLink's RISCV support is pretty solid already -- I don't think we'll have any trouble moving over when we're ready. If you want to test the RuntimeDyld changes you could add `llvm-rtdyld` tests (see `llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld`), but given that this is a stop-gap I'm ok with the changes going in as-is. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99336 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
