labath wrote: > I'm actually surprised that lldb-dap sees the new diagnostics because I > thought it would run the expression through a lower-level API like > SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). But I guess it just provides a "terminal" > window that passes everything through HandleCommand. To support this better, > I'm thinking about adding a setting to opt into the inline diagnostics that > only `lldb` sets, so we don't get unexpected results like this.
It has both. lldb-dap does this weird heuristic console multiplexing, where it guesses whether something should be treated like an expression (I guess that's because other VSCode debuggers do that), which is executed through EvaluateExpression, or an lldb command, which is executed through HandleCommand. So it's not very likely that a user will be running a "command" to evaluate an expression, but I think it still illustrates my point that HandleCommand can be (and probably is) invoked in contexts where one cannot guarantee the alignment of the output. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106470 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
