krytarowski added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23881#525420, @mgorny wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23881#525411, @krytarowski wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23881#525405, @mgorny wrote: > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23881#525401, @krytarowski wrote: > > > > > > > The proper way to fix it is to install CheckAtomic from LLVM/Clang. > > > > > > > > See https://reviews.llvm.org/D22999 > > > > > > > > > Wasn't that rejected? > > > > > > There was rejected a proposal to add CheckAtomic copy to LLDB. Not a > > proposal to install CheckAtomic for more customers of LLVM. > > > Ah, sorry, I didn't read that thoroughly. Should I create a patch for that, > or will you handle it from here? Please create it and I will test it on NetBSD. Please add reviewers from https://reviews.llvm.org/D22999 Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D23881 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
