joshimbriani added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23290#511275, @clayborg wrote:
> Can you explain the scenarios where you are going to use LLDB with pipes? Sure! Essentially we are duplicating some of the functionality of the command line, specifically when commands need confirmation (like process handle or breakpoint delete). We are interacting with LLDB to confirm these commands via pipes. And since pipes aren't inherently interactive, we need a way to override the interactivity check so that LLDB will give us the output we want, regardless of whether we are using pipes or not. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23290 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
