sas added a comment.
Ah yes, good idea not to use `AsCString()` here.
I think changing the `!=` to `==` is the right thing to do here because the bug
was introduced in r263995:
@@ -122,7 +125,7 @@ IRExecutionUnit::DisassembleFunction (Stream &stream,
for (JittedFunction &function : m_jitted_functions)
{
- if (strstr(function.m_name.c_str(), m_name.AsCString()))
+ if (function.m_name.AsCString() != m_name.AsCString())
{
func_local_addr = function.m_local_addr;
func_remote_addr = function.m_remote_addr;
The previous code was using `strstr` to check if the function names matched,
but has been changed to `!=`; probably a typo assuming we were doing `strcmp`
instead of `strstr`.
I'll wait for @Spyffe to confirm.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20312
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
