labath added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17088#350005, @zturner wrote:
> I think technically there are some platforms that cannot be both a host and a > target. ios and anything involving a simulator comes to mind. But, if the > only "gotcha" to having both of them be in the same enum is that it's up to > the programmer to make sure he's using the right value in the context, then > perhaps it's not the end of the world. Although unlikely, I don't think there is an inherent reason lldb could not run there, so yeah, I think one list is better. > BTW, there were some things I wasn't sure whether to add to the enum here. > `android`, `remote_android`, `ios-simulator`, etc. Should I add them, or > should I leave it as is for now and let other people fix up their own > platforms? I think we should let people add targets when they need to, so let's leave these out for now. As I said, right now we treat android as a flavour of linux. When we change that we can add `android` and `linux_all` (or something like that) to the list. http://reviews.llvm.org/D17088 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
