zturner added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936#347141, @labath wrote:
> I think this is getting way too complicated. I haven't seen any test > which needs such complicated combinations of skip conditions (and I > hope I never see one). I agree that you don't need arbitrary complexity, but I think there are some things we would greatly benefit from. For example, have you ever seen this? @expectedFailureWindows @expectedFailureGcc @expectedFailureHostLinux That's 3 decorators, when you could write it as 1: @expectedFailure(or(oslist="windows", compiler="gcc", hostoslist="linux")) The rest of the functionality I mentioned you practically get for free if you support this. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
