zturner marked 2 inline comments as done. zturner added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16830#342842, @tberghammer wrote:
> Looks reasonable and I agree with Pavel in the idea of moving the android > related utility functions into their own file for better separation I thought about creating an android specific module but I decided taht there is so little code right now it might not make sense. And then we already had this lldbplatformutil file that had only 1 function in it, so nobody was even really using it. So rather than end up with 2 different modules with 3 functions each, just have just have 1 module with 6 functions. On the other hand, if they continue to grow, then splitting apart makes a lot of sense. It's not a big deal to me either way, so if you guys feel strongly I can move it. Since you're in a different time zone though and might not get this for another 24 hours, maybe I'll commit like this and then if you http://reviews.llvm.org/D16830 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
