LGTM. I think we should submit this patch as tberghammer explained.
On 8 January 2016 at 19:24, Tamas Berghammer <tbergham...@google.com> wrote: > tberghammer added a comment. > > @omjavaid: What is your opinion about submitting this patch in its current > form with knowing that setting watchpoints from a 64bit lldb-server into > 32bit inferior will fail? > > I think this patch is a step in the good direction to make a 64bit > lldb-server capable of debugging a 32bit inferior. Considering how few > arm/aarch64 (android) devices are supporting watchpoints I don't think we > should block on that issue. > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D15533 > > > _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
