zturner added a comment. I thought about this some more and I'm fine with going with a single implementation and not using std async. It would be nice to take advantage of any deep optimizations std::async provides over a hand-rolled solution, but at the same time there's a cost to adding complexity and asymmetric implementations, even if the asymmetry is hidden behind this interface. And the gain we get from goign single threaded -> this implementation is much greater than we would theoretically get from going from this implementation -> std async.
I'll look more closely at the implementation and see if I have other comments, but the general idea is fine. http://reviews.llvm.org/D13727 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
